🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to safeguard females from violence, including family violence, following extensive and heated discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The final authority now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last year, requiring authorities to establish laws and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on gender equality weakens family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a action proposed by opposition parties but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the main political groups advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has called on the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread protest both within Latvia and internationally.

22,000 individuals have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a protest for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a rash decision driven by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey left the treaty four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority support, the president could potentially return the legislation for further review if he has concerns.

Head of State the national leader stated on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial factors, rather than belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a human rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in multiple European countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could influence comparable discussions in additional EU countries